b'C H A P T E R F I VEConcern. (The latter would direct a one-year moratorium on all building bordering on the harbor complex.)That item of storm water drainage spawned the most questions that evening. Why did runoff always seem to wind up in Oyster Pond, someone asked. Planner Margo Fenn went to bat, explaining that the towns storm water drains emptied directly into that body of water. Then Shellfish Constable Stuart Moore shook up some of the listeners, according to The Chronicle, when he reported that in a recent measurement of contamination, the highest counts were in Mill Pond, not Oyster Pond. Hence, he said, Mill Pond might well be the next site to be closed to shellfishing. Obviously, the problems being addressed by harbor management planners were far from theoretical.Taking over as the new FCW president, Martha Stone decided in September 1990 to write the Harbor Planning subcommittee, expressing enthusiasm for its draft. Along with her congratulations, she observed: We are pleased (and not at all surprised!) that the Draft Report has been recognized beyond Chatham and is serving as a model for other communities in the Commonwealth.Not everyone was entirely enthusiastic about the draft, and through the next months the subcommittee made adjustments dealing with nitrogen loading, wetland buffer areas, and dredging. Pointing toward a public hearing on the plan on August 12, 1991, the drafters published an eight-page insert carried in The Chronicle beforehand. It covered Goals and Policies For Resolving Harbor Issuesphase\'"Hart*01This eight-page supplement tothe C hronicles issue of Augustprepare" 8,1991, just ahead of a public hearing four days later, was paid for by FCW as a public service.67'